The Justice A Arumughaswamy Commission of Inquiry examined Dr L F Sridhar, a cardiothoracic surgeon and was among the medical doctors who attended to Jayalalithaa during her hospitalisation.
The panel has examined various doctors on Jayalalithaa’s wellbeing concerns and difficulties, the diagnostic exams performed and therapy possibilities pursued as section of its reality obtaining physical exercise.
N Raja Senthhoor Pandian, counsel for V K Sasikala, confidante of the late Jayalalithaa, informed reporters that he asked the surgeon if vegetation in the mitral valve of the late chief was the cause for the cardiac arrest she suffered on December 4, 2016.
“The medical professional replied that it was not the cause and he also testified that the late chief did not have any coronary heart health conditions and there was no need for any (cardiac) surgical procedure,” he stated.
To a query on why an angiogram was not carried out, the counsel quoted the surgeon as telling the panel that she did not need it at any place in time and it was a diagnostic check that experienced almost nothing to do with her vegetation.
“The cardiac arrest was only a consequence Jayalalithaa faced in view of a bundle of ailments she had.
The cardiac arrest was not thanks to possibly vegetation or (valve) perforation…the doctor instructed the panel,” he reported.
Counsel for Apollo Medical center, Maimoona Badsha reported the physician, in his deposition, claimed septicaemia also brought about vegetation, as very well as valve perforation and Jayalalithaa was for this reason provided antibiotics.
Even on September 28, 2016 when her infection was large, the perforation was very compact.
He concurred that the obtaining of all the physicians was just the exact same, which was that Jayalalithaa did not will need any invasive medical procedures.
Even a group of AIIMS medical doctors from Delhi, who frequented Jayalalithaa on December 3, 2016 experienced opined that there was no need for any cardiac investigation or intervention, he reported.
Before, a gentleman who desired to depose as a witness, incoherently claimed that he has “introduced in Jayalalithaa with him and that he had talked to her every single working day” and that the panel had declined to hear him, in accordance to Pandian.